Ask our Moms Share my experience Share my photos
  Browse the Encyclopedia
Search
 
Parenting Encyclopedia
 

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the following United States district courts:

It holds court in Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, and Pasadena (and occasionally Anchorage and Honolulu). Its headquarters are in San Francisco.

The Ninth Circuit is also by far the largest Circuit court in the US and it has the largest number of judges, with 28 positions currently authorized for the court (one of which is currently unfilled). Because of its large size, the court rarely sits for a full en banc court of all active judges. Instead, the court provides for a "limited en banc" review of a randomly-selected 11 judge panel. This means that en banc reviews may not actually reflect the views of the majority of the court, and indeed may not include any of the three judges involved in the decision being reviewed in the first place. The result is a high risk of intracircuit conflicts of law — where different groupings of judges end up delivering mutually contradictory opinions. This creates chaos in the district courts, which become unsure as to which opinion to follow.

The court is considered by some to have an overly liberal bias, but some people disagree. 17 judges on the court have been appointed by Democratic presidents and 10 have been appointed by Republican presidents, but liberal judges are often appointed by conservative presidents, and vice-versa, so the composition is subject to varying interpretation.

It is often called "the most overturned appeals court in the United States", but the court has a higher caseload than most other circuit courts. From 1992 to 2003, the lowest percentage of overturned appeals by the ninth circuit was 68 percent. The highest was 95 percent. The average percentage of Ninth Circuit Court decisions overturned by the Supreme Court during this time was 73.5 percent as compared to an average of 61 percent by the all the other circuit courts of appeal combined.

Because California lies within its territory, the court hears cases involving celebrities from time to time. In one well-known case involving Vanna White, Judge Alex Kozinski noted that "we are the Court of Appeals for the Hollywood Circuit."

In 2002, it made one of its most controversial decisions to date in the case of Newdow v. United States Congress. The court ruled that encouraging public school students to recite a pledge which includes the phrase "under God" (the Pledge of Allegiance) violated the First Amendment ban on establishment of religion. The decision was penned for the majority by Nixon appointee Alfred T. Goodwin , one of the senior status (semi-retired) judges on the court. The Supreme Court overturned this decision on June 14, 2004, because the plaintiff, Michael Newdow, lacked legal standing to bring suit. The Court did not address the constitutionality of the pledge.

The court is also on the leading edge of federalism, recently refusing to enforce federal laws against homemade pornography (US v. McCoy ), homemade firearms (US v. Stewart), and homegrown marijuana (Raich v. Ashcroft). The court reasoned that application of such laws exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, basing the decision on the Supreme Court case United States v. Lopez.

Judges

The judges on the court (as of December 8, 2004) are:

(Here circuit judges and senior circuit judges are listed in order of seniority.)

Three judgeships are vacant.

External links

The contents of this article are licensed from Wikipedia.org under the
GNU Free Documentation License. How to see transparent copy


 
Pregnancy Calendar
Q&A Forum
Articles
Baby Photos
Parenting Encyclopedia
Weblinks
Site Map